top of page

Learning from Experience

Toolkit Home  |  Phase 1  |  Phase 2  |  Phase 3  |  Phase 4 

For the final stage of the QIF, after the intervention has been fully implemented, the team needs to review the entire implementation process and articulate what they have learned. Not only can they learn from their own experience, but they should share these lessons learned with other attempting similar projects.  

​

For this step, the implementation team needs to identify: 

​

  • the lessons that have been learned about the implementation of the intervention.  

  • The best channels for sharing this information with others that may be interested in enacting similar interventions. 

Tools to use during the Learning from Experience phase:

FORMATIVE EVALUATION

TOOLKIT EVALUATION GUIDE

Formative Evaluation

This formative evaluation training package guides the implementation support team in completing formative evaluation using mixed methods for internal learning of the implementation process. Formative evaluation gathers and analyzes feedback during the implementation process. The goal is to enable teams to know what changes to make on the project while they are still implementing it. 

Who should use Formative Evaluation? 

Any team that is working on an implementation project should develop standards used to evaluate their progress during the implementation process. Teams with complex structures or untested interventions would benefit from working through the full Formative Evaluation training to design a complex multi-stage evaluation process. â€‹

​

How does the tool help with Implementation? 

The training provides a base line for the kind of summative evaluation questions teams should be asking. Formative evaluation needs to be accounted for during Phase three as part of the Process evaluation step. ​The use of the formative evaluation tools should be used during the entire implementation process.

​

Resources recommended:

Time: Using the Formative Evaluation training to design and implement a full evaluation process for the team's implementation process can be time intensive depending on the needs of the team. Time heavy resource

​

People: Most of the implementation planning team should be involved in developing the evaluation process with input from those directly working with the interventions. Personnel medium resource.

​

Funding: The only cost for the tool itself is the personnel time to create and implement the evaluation process. Funding heavy resource.

​

  • Formative Evaluation Training

    • ​Full Slide deck with description of training along with slides that cover qualitative, quantitative, and mix-methods data collection along with how to select the appropriate method. 

​​​​

Back to Top of Page

Toolkit Evaluation Guide

The toolkit evaluation guide assesses the implementation process, identifies missed steps, and facilitates and informs discussions about how to improve the process of moving through the four phases of the Quality Implementation Framework (QIF). The guide also provides specific deliverables and markers of success for each QIF phase. The answers to the questions will allow the user to assess if the activities are occurring as expected. 

Who should use the Toolkit Evaluation Guide?

Every team should use the evaluation guide to develop their implementation strategy and should evaluate the process after each step.​

​

How does the tool help with Implementation? 

The Toolkit Evaluation Guide enables a feasible, structured process to identify how the implementation process is going, as well as missed steps and/or areas for improvement. Through this evaluation process, the questionnaire enables awareness and accountability at every phase of the QIF.

​

Resources recommended:

Time: Each tool you use during the QIF step needs to be evaluated. However, this evaluation does not need to be exhaustive, but capturing how the process went and if the tool met the teams need is helpful when trying to ascertain the success of the implementation process while still implementing the intervention. Time light resource

​

People: Ideally the implementation support team will evaluate each step together, but the lead on each tool could fill in most of the relevant information. Personnel light resource.

​

Funding: Personnel time is the only funding resource needed. Funding light resource.

​

​

Back to Top of Page

Become a member and get access to research resources and services offered by the CCTST. Click here to apply.

CONTACT US:

CCTST: cctst@uc.edu 

REDCap: help-redcap@bmi.cchmc.org

240 Albert Sabin Way, Location S, Suite 2.200

Cincinnati, Ohio 45229

The Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) is a registered trademark of DHHS NIH Acknowledgment:

 

Publications resulting from use of CCTST resources must credit the appropriate CCTST grant by including an NIH Funding acknowledgment: The CCTST at the University of Cincinnati is funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program, grant UM1TR005265. The CTSA program is led by the NIH’s National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS). The content of this website is solely the responsibility of the CCTST and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

bottom of page