Implementation
Resources on this page
Logistics
Leadership
Decision-making
Leadership, power, and decision-making examples
Logistics
-
Clarifying operating procedures (what a CAB does) and operating principles (how it gets those things done)
-
Developing operating principles examples
-
Adams AK, Scott JR, Prince R, et al. Using community advisory boards to reduce environmental barriers to health in American Indian communities, Wisconsin, 2007-2012. Prev Chronic Dis 2014; 11: E160.
-
Braun KL, Tsark JU, Santos L, et al. Building Native Hawaiian capacity in cancer research and programming. Cancer 2006; 107(Suppl. 8): 2082–2090
-
-
-
Integrating members’ and the community’s values that inform CAB procedures can generate trust. These values are often called “Guiding Principles” and can be co-developed as a trust-building tool.
-
Examples
-
Mutual respect
-
Inclusivity over division
-
Letting members agree to disagree
-
Speaking from an “I” perspective
-
Active listening
-
-
Newman SD, Andrews JO, Magwood GS, et al. Community advisory boards in community-based participatory research: a synthesis of best processes. Prev Chronic Dis 2011; 8: A70.
-
Schlechter CR, Del Fiol G, Lam CY, et al. Application of community – engaged dissemination and implementation science to improve health equity. Prev Med Rep 2021; 24: 101620.
-
Butterfoss FD. Coalitions and partnerships in community health. San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass, 2007.
-
Israel BA, Lichtenstein R, Lantz P, et al. The Detroit Community-Academic Urban Research Center: development, implementation, and evaluation. J Public Health Manag Pract 2001; 7: 1–19.
-
-
Decide structured vs. free-form
-
Structured: Agendas and activities set, goal-driven
-
Free-form: responsive to ongoing issues
-
Members will have different preferences, refer to purpose of CAB for help with this decision, and opt for a tailored hybrid
-
-
Principles to be revisited and amended as necessary
Leadership
-
Creating an equitable leadership structure helps to alleviate mistrust and ensure that the CAB’s work is grounded in community needs AND increase participation, satisfaction, and consensus-building
-
Consider backgrounds of (academic, social, cultural) of members
-
Decision-making
-
Do CABs inform decisions, determine outcomes, and/or have final say?
-
Important to be transparent about this (strengthens engagement and sustainability)
-
Can opt for a hybrid approach as long as it’s clear to members
-
Can opt for a “select few” approach where 1-2 leaders in the CAB are selected to represent the CAB in decision-making
-
This can be a challenge to navigate, can put pressure on the selected leaders and lead to frustration
-
-
Leadership, power, and decision-making examples
-
Klinkenberg WD and Sacks S; HIV/AIDS Treatment Adherence, Health Outcomes and Cost Study Group. Mental disorders and drug abuse in persons living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Care 2004; 16(Suppl. 1): S22–S42.
-
Baptiste DR, Bhana A, Petersen I, et al. Community collaborative youth-focused HIV/ AIDS prevention in South Africa and Trinidad: preliminary findings. J Pediatr Psychol 2006; 31: 905–916.